----------------------------------
DYNAMIC EXPLORATION INDEX TO ALL THE WEB PAGES ON THIS SITE
Click THIS LINK to access a new dynamic index to
explore all the resources and information
on this site.
----------------------------------
If you have a PC and IE5+ Click here to Show table of contents
| Tere is now good evidence that "Just Taylor" is Joe Jared of Orange, CA. |
Update Page on "Just Taylor's"
Immoral,
Unethical, and Illegal
Activities and on Those Who Aid and Abet Him
Answer: a group of anonymous punks, who have not
grown up and who try to control Usenet and
the Internet for their sick kicks. They are intimately connected with the
abuse newsgroup,
alt.usenet.kooks, and are known for ruining several newsgroup through their
"kook-hunting" activities.
They have ruined not only several alt.* newsgroups, but have also ruined a
number of newsgroups
in the sci.* hierarchy (including, most notably, sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and sci.med.diseases.hepatitis).
They find people who it appears other would like to see picked on. They
decide if they "don't like" the
person and then they anonymously and personally and with huge amounts of
off-topic spam attack the
person in about every way possible. They are delighted when they can get
the battle to include their
flagship abuse newsgroup, alt.usenet.kooks.
This is the group of punks to which Rich Tietjens is not only a proud member,
but a leader. He is also
associated with other punk groups such as the "lumber cartel".
Abuse of whatever Internet "powers" he
can muster to personally abuse people is the main kick of all these sick groups
of psychopaths.
Answer: Well, Rich Tietjens fancies himself as an
aggressive "anti-spammer", having his own special and
convenient definitions of spam (which is WAY outside any normal understanding)
and he enforces his
standards on the world. This is exactly what "Just Taylor" aka
"Taylor Jimenez" aka "Taylor Netscum" aka
Just Joe Jared does. There is also a history of Rich Tietjens also supporting
and befriending THE Sanford
(Spamford) Wallace. Rich is highly tolerant of clear spam being done by his
friends and is a sick hypocrite.
It appears it is "okay" as far as good-old Rich is
concerned if people host web pages on his servers
that have false headers and are purely personal and malicious. Rich does
not care if thousands of
people using search engines to look for legitimate content get misdirected to
irrelevant web pages and
thus wasting their time (the time of thousands) with INTERNET SPAM -- stuff
anyone would recognize as
DEFINITE SPAM. (This is unwanted stuff they get to look at that is FALSELY
AND WRONGFULLY
pushed on them -- THAT * IS * **SPAM**, my friends.)
Answer: YES. I provide quotes from Rich
himself made to Usenet showing how he not only is
befriending THE Sanford Wallace, but OFFERING HIM USE OF HIS SERVERS FOR
"HIS BRAND"
OF ANTI-'SPAM'!!!
Rich Tietjens
4/98
Rich Tietjens, Secret Master of the Internet Cabal wrote:
[snip]
>
> Jim is OOTGG*. If he says Sandy Wallace is one of us, too, I'll take hsi word
> for it. Besides, I've seen some things in the past couple of weeks that I was
> SURE were impossible. After those, Sandy Wallace wearing a white hat is no
> longer very remarkable.
>
> * - One Of The Good Guys
In <6i14co$3p0_014@riogrande.spambusters>, on 04/27/1998
at 05:17 AM, abuse@aol.net (Rich Tietjens, Secret Master of the
Internet Cabal) said:
>Jim is OOTGG*. If he says Sandy Wallace is one of us, too, I'll take
>hsi word for it.
---------
5/98
>Rich Tietjens, Secret Master of the Internet Cabal wrote:
>>
>>In article <3568c5f4.663574461@news.pc-intouch.com>, mark@pc-intouch.com (Mark
>>Wells) wrote:
>> >
>> >RFC-compliant email is a reliable medium. If one mail program (MTA or
>> >MUA, it doesn't matter) can't send to another mail program, it sends a
>> >bounce. If the spammer can't receive your remove requests because of
>> >technical problems or because the spammer gave you a fake reply
>> >address, you will find out. In the latter case, the spammer isn't
>> >behaving in a very RFC-compliant manner, and gets fined under
>> >Murkowski. ^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> You have a great deal more faith in the FTC than I do.
>>
>> Want to give me odds on the FTC pursuing a complaint against Joe The
>> Chain-Letter Spammer?
>>
>The FTC probably wouldn't go after Sanford Wallace (should he
>backslide). Why would they go after Joe?
>
> Moi
-------------
From: Secret Master of the Internet Cabal (noaccount@nohost.nospam)
Subject: Re: GTMI noise - Sanford's 2 cents
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Date: 1998/04/09
Troy Williams wrote:
>
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Tue, 07 Apr 98 05:34:12 GMT, noaccount@nohost.ipns.com (Rich
> Tietjens) wrote:
>
> >I am NOT a regular here any more - but if Wallace is sincere about that offer,
Well, I guess that's no longer true. Damn thing is addictive.
> >I will provide a Web site and an ftp site for distribution of the spam
> >filtering software (if it passes examination by a panel of qualified admins,
> >to make sure it's not a trojan or something).
>
> I'd go ahead and find a 386 that is not being used and then try to run
> it there first to make sure that it's not going to damage the data on
> any other computers. Then if you can, try to examine the software and
> make sure that it's going to live up to what it's supposed to do.
Never a problem, I have a spare Pentium/166 that's too slow for "real
work," so I use it as a test bed.
> >My Reply-To: header is valid. Mr. Wallace, if you're reading this, you can
> >demonstrate good faith - or you can fail to do so. Your move.
>
> Oh, I'm sure that he's going to try to do whatever he can right now to
> make it look like he's really anti-spam, but I seriously doubt if he
> will stay this way for long.
No response so far.
(end quoted post)
NOW
Extracting the FIRST SET of remarks of Rich Tietjens and repeating
that portion of the above post:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 07 Apr 98 05:34:12 GMT, noaccount@nohost.ipns.com (Rich
Tietjens) wrote:
>I am NOT a regular here any more - but if Wallace is sincere about that offer,
>I will provide a Web site and an ftp site for distribution of the spam
>filtering software (if it passes examination by a panel of qualified admins,
>to make sure it's not a trojan or something).
>My Reply-To: header is valid. Mr. Wallace, if you're reading this, you can
>demonstrate good faith - or you can fail to do so. Your move.
LOOKS LIKE SUCH A FRIENDSHIP INDEED CAME TO PASS.
-----------------
From: S.P. (KKK@KKK.KKK)
Subject: EAt ShiT ANd DiE is Sanford Wallace's Friend. Sanford Wallace
Trolling Anti-Spammers.
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email,
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Date: 1998/04/27
eat.shit@and.die.com wrote:
>[nasty f-word deleted] YOU SANFORD
>
> DIE YOU PIECE OF SHIT
>
> DIE
>
> EAT SHIT & DIE
Mr. Wallace, I am certain that you are paying someone to post these
threats against you, so that you build sympathy for yourself, keep your
name before the media, and yank the chains of people you must truly hate
for what they did to your business.
Geeks and nerds like Rich Tietjens and Jim Nitchals might buy this, but
anyone with more experience in public relations can see clearly that
these death threats are your doing.
I can see you now, Mr. Wallace, laughing at your former opponents,
gloating in the media spotlight, knowing full well that reporters are
certainly reading your trolls.
Mr. Wallace, the geeks and idiots that compose the majority of this
newsgroup, who are our toys to play with and do with as we please, they
might buy these "eat.shit.and.die" posts, but anyone with any political
savvy can see that you are posting these yourself.
You are a master of publicity, Mr. Wallace. And you are a consummate
troll.
SP
------------------
5/98
Rich Tietjens wrote:
> "G.I. E-Marketing" <adultmail@mailshuttle.com> wrote:
>
> ]Attn: Webmasters and Webpromoters.
> ]
> ]We bulk email for adult sites!
>
> And *we* get adult sites that use unsolicited bulk email for advertising shut
> down.
>
> If you want to go out of business, use bulk email! Guaranteed! Ask Sanford
> Wallace!
9/99
From: Rich Tietjens (icesnake@home.com)
Subject: [email] FREE Satellite Dish and 15,000+ FREE products and services!
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
Date: 1999/09/22
YAHOO: Please terminate the spammer's dropbox account at:
sally31001@yahoo.com
techplc.co.uk - the spammer used your SMTP server, IP address 193.130.14.2.
Your server is an open relay and has been reported to ORBS and the MAPS RSS.
You may get off these blacklists by visiting their Web pages and following
instructions there.
UUNET: The spammer is in Slidell, Louisiana and is suspected to be
connected to BAYOUCOM aka FREECYBERCITY
FREE4UONLINE: You host the spammer's Web site - see body of spam for the
URL.
SPAMMER: "Theft by conversion" is the litigious name for sending junk
email; it was so identified in US Federal District Court in 1997. You are
already liable to me for $500 under Washington law, and if you spam
traversed servers in or was sent to residents of Virginia, you may be in
felony violation of Virginia's anti-spam law. You would do well to get
yourself a legitimate job and stop pushing your luck; when you spam, fully
85 percent of your addressees will be angered by the spam, and of the
remaining 15 percent, many will successfully complain to get your account
(or entire domain in some cases) "removed" from the Internet. I am one of
those. The positive response rate to spam is said by Sanford Wallace,
ex-spammer, to be well under 0.01 percent - so you would have to spam about
10,000 people to find even one person who is willing to make an inquiry, and
at least 100,000 to make a sale. In addition, your spam seems to promote an
illegal pyramid scheme, so I have passed it on to the appropriate department
at the Federal Trade Commission for investigation and possible prosecution
on Federal charges. Have a nice day.
-----------------
----------------
See this link a very "rich" example:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=eVyCDh8I9GA.209%40upnetnews03&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3DeVyCDh8I9GA.209%2540upnetnews03
OR (equivalently)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?Y282522D3
Answer: Not sure. He is head of the Western Division of
Kryptonite Computers, an outfit that supposedly
provides hot computers to gamers. They say they are gamers building
other computers for gamers.
Contact information OTHER than email addresses is VERY hard to find (or
unavailable) -- very odd
for any responsible business.
Some reports I have seen on the newsgroups indicate their computers they do
build may not be anything special.
Rich, or his company anyway, is also a sponsor of the web site pc-gamereview.com
and all the email addresses
for the company are *@pc-gamereview.com Thus, they seem to be
big kids in their 30s who have never
grown up. But, Rich is more than this. He is a proven punk.
The company has very crappy web pages, lacking in the normal headers that
would make the company
findable on the Internet. (It is almost as if the company was a false
front for some other sort of business!!)
(The web pages Kryptonite Computers and pc-gamereview.com do have are green on
black and very
primitive -- JUST EXACTLY THE SAME LOOK, ETC. THAT "Just Taylor's"
false/defamatory personal
pages ON HIS ANON, FALSELY-REGISTERED DOMAIN have, down to even the green on
black
theme!!!)
Rich is also supposedly some top officer of some anti-spam company (no doubt
a division of Kryptonite
Computers). He is a lover of Spammy / "Taylor Jimenez" and
"Taylor" is a lover of him.
It is also noteworthy that the "company" (which gives itself the look
of a national company, on its
pathetic web pages) is incredibly inbreed. At least four other persons who
work for Kryptonite
Computers SHARE THE SAME LAST NAME TIETJENS!! (Worse than a hillbilly
clan!!!)
Rich is such a depraved hypocrite and so warped he seems to think the world
would support this behavior and
he posted a letter to Usenet where I complained of his behavior in this regard.
Dear pc-gamereview.com (PLEASE FORWARD THIS AS NECESSARY)
PLEASE CONTACT YOUR SERVICE PROVIDER IMMEDIATELY TO TAKE CARE OF THIS
PROBLEM
I am told on good authority that despite ANY possible appearances to the
contrary (**due to forwarding devices**) the person I am talking about BELOW
IS IP# 199.107.162.194 (i.e. YOU). His page and ALL his connecting pages
I address below are connected to YOUR machine. It is ONE of the web
sites AT your address. An alias goes to someplace on YOUR IP.
YOU are the responsible party. Please look into this
matter immediately and take all appropriate actions.
I am going to describe a problem that ANY reasonable company with any
reasonable AUP/TOS would see as a problem and as a violation of their
terms.
There is an anonymous person who "owns" THIS malicious alias
www.wilhelp.com domain -- the registration of
which you keep secret and is likely invalid. This person has this
domain solely to do personal defamation of me. The fact that this is his
intent is completely clear when one sees that he make his meta descriptions of
his pages entirely invalid. And, he makes the meta-tags exact copies of
those tags on my legitimate web page PRECISELY SO SEARCH ENGINES LOOKING FOR
MY LEGITIMATE PAGES WILL FIND HIS AT THE SAME TIME AND SO DEFAMATION OF ME
OCCURS.
The most flagrant example of this I will now provide.
The main index page to my web site has the following meta-tags (recently
modified so they are NOT any longer exactly identical to the same tags YOUR
CUSTOMER stole from me) My main web page of my
http://cyberper.cnc.net web site has the
following meta-tags:
<meta name="keywords" content="Brad
Jesness,psychotherapy,abuse,fraud,science,problems,critique,diagnoses,assessment,personality,scoring,test,inventory,inventories,automatic,program,free,download,newsgroup,history,Usenet,sci.psychology.psychotherapy,learning,development,ethology,theory,clinical,psychologist,counseling,peer
counselor,selection,effectiveness,prediction">
<meta name="description" content="Brad Jesness page seeks to identify
the most major problems for clinical or counseling psychology if it
wants to be a science. Free automatic scoring of major inventories
program, available for free download. Ethological/developmental theory
of learning. Major links. Documents psychologists' Usenet abuses.
Definitive history of the sci.psychology.psychotherapy newsgroup. Also
has Peer Counselor Selection Tool.">
<meta http-equiv="expires" content="0">
(THESE ARE THE METATAGS FOR MY WEB SITE
http://cyberper.cnc.net )
Your customer's most embarassing and defamatory web page on me is:
http://www.wilhelp.com/[address of particular false and defamatory site and page
snipped]
The metatags for YOUR CUSTOMER'S PAGE (tags WHICH HE SOLE WORD-FOR-WORD
FROM ME) ARE on that very http://www.wilhelp.com/[address of particular false and
defamatory site and page
snipped] web page are as
follows. THIS ABSOLUTELY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CONTENT OF HIS WEB
PAGE AND AREONLY THERE
TO SOLICIT HARASSMENT AND DEFAMATION OF ME, AS SEARCH ENGINES FIND HIS
PAGE AS THEY FIND MINE!!! (I will provide you with a sample search which shows this exact
problem.):
<meta name="keywords" content="psychotherapy, abuse, fraud, science, problems, critique, diagnoses,
procedures, assessment, personality, scoring, inventories, individual, differences, learning,
development, ethology, theory, free, automatic, clinical, psychologist, counseling, Usenet, abuse,
peer counselor, selection, effectiveness, prediction, personality">
<meta name="description" content="Page seeks to identify the most major problems for clinical or
counseling psychology if it wants to be a science. Free automatic scoring of major inventories
program. Ethological/developmental theory of learning. Major links. Documents psychologists
Usenet abuses. Also has Peer Counselor Selection Tool.">
His FALSE METATAGS LEAD PEOPLE
LOOKING FOR MY
CONTENT TO HIS FALSE and DEFAMATORY PAGES
[snip].
This sort of intentional false advertising of a web page BY ONE OF YOUR
CUSTOMERS for
clearly malicious purposes must violate your TOS or AUP.
Please look into this immediately and take reasonable action.
Sincerely,
Brad Jesness
Apparently, it is okay with Rich Tietjens
(Richard Tietjens) if the person
he
gives web space to NOT ONLY falsely register their web pages
CREATING A LOT OF INTERNET SPAM and much unethical
inconvenience for decent Internet users BUT he also apparently
does not care if the people whose sites and pages he hosts STEAL
material directly from other people's web sites.
Also
in the material above we have seen evidence that the
hatemonger, Sanford Wallace, is not only a best pal of Rich
Tietjens, but this disgraceful, immoral, hate-filled Wallace is
indeed the BRAINS BEHIND SpamBlocked.com -- the joke of
a company Rich "Morely Dotes" Tietjens is "CEO" of -- &
SPEWS.
This is very much supported by the Usenet record of their posts and
you can see further evidence of a link to Sanford Wallace by viewing
my web page called jimenez_wallace.htm
Please click this link to
also learn more about the CABAL.
In short, Rich Tietjens is scum.
By his own declaration
Tietjens is Master of NOTHING ((Proof:
Tietjens proclaims himself
"Master of the CABAL" but also all these punks assert "there is
no CABAL", therefore
Rich Tietjens is Master of NOTHING.)
For just a Sample of what a HATEMONGER Sanford Wallace is, CLICK
HERE.
For more on Sanford Wallace/ Taylor Jimenez (Joe Jared) behavior similarities, see
freak_of_nature.htm and jimenez_wallace.htm